From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, npiggin@suse.de,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, drepper@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:48:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ORnj2-0008JJ-PN@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikKTtNlWEgAL1s2uxIFDPZWn2FDYDQg96mpDsv8@mail.gmail.com> (message from Andrew Lutomirski on Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:37:31 -0400)
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Wasn't the point that /proc/self/mounts (and presumably
> /proc/self/mountinfo) isn't scalable and we wanted a syscall to query
> it efficiently (and racelessly)?
The question was how to support statvfs() efficiently, and the only
thing missing there is f_flags which can easily be added to the
existing statfs() syscall.
A separate mount_info() syscall might possibly be useful, but that's
another story.
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-24 13:14 [rfc] new stat*fs-like syscall? Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 14:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-06-24 14:36 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 14:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2010-06-24 14:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-06-24 14:37 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2010-06-24 14:48 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2010-06-25 3:50 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-24 23:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-24 23:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25 4:01 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-25 4:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25 17:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-06-25 17:52 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-25 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-25 18:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-25 19:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-26 5:53 ` J. R. Okajima
2010-06-26 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-26 12:54 ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-05 20:58 ` Brad Boyer
2010-07-05 23:31 ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-06 0:45 ` Brad Boyer
2010-07-06 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07 1:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-07 2:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-26 14:49 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-06-26 10:13 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ORnj2-0008JJ-PN@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).