From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753113Ab2JASDS (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:03:18 -0400 Received: from jdl.com ([208.123.74.7]:39241 "EHLO jdl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752721Ab2JASDB (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:03:01 -0400 Message-Id: To: Rob Herring cc: Stephen Warren , Michal Marek , David Gibson , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren Subject: Re: dtc: import latest upstream dtc In-reply-to: <5069C042.40209@gmail.com> References: <1348867559-2495-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <5069C042.40209@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Rob Herring message dated "Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:09:38 -0500." Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:02:53 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger X-Spam-Score: -0.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Seems dtc doesn't really have a maintainer. Picking nits, let's be clear on that phraseology: Seems dtc doesn't really have a maintainer within the kernel repository. Over in git.jdl.com land, there is a well established maintainer for the upstream DTC. > Probably makes more sense > for me to take this unless there are objections. Please, and thank you. jdl