From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932612AbcFGN22 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:28:28 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:47750 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754524AbcFGN2Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:28:25 -0400 From: Mark Brown To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Mark Brown , broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1465165177-16680-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:28:18 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Applied "regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable" to the regulator tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The patch regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >>From 124256548f4e7d3ff81a37a64acb439778bcdbfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabio Estevam Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:17:38 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable We should better not use a global 'struct pfuze_regulator' variable, as this could cause problems if multiple regulator chips are used. Place it inside the private struct instead. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c index 2a44e5dd9c2a..bcdf9206f3ee 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct pfuze_chip { struct device *dev; struct pfuze_regulator regulator_descs[PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR]; struct regulator_dev *regulators[PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR]; + struct pfuze_regulator *pfuze_regulators; }; static const int pfuze100_swbst[] = { @@ -334,8 +335,6 @@ static struct pfuze_regulator pfuze3000_regulators[] = { PFUZE100_VGEN_REG(PFUZE3000, VLDO4, PFUZE100_VGEN6VOL, 1800000, 3300000, 100000), }; -static struct pfuze_regulator *pfuze_regulators; - #ifdef CONFIG_OF /* PFUZE100 */ static struct of_regulator_match pfuze100_matches[] = { @@ -563,21 +562,21 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client, /* use the right regulators after identify the right device */ switch (pfuze_chip->chip_id) { case PFUZE3000: - pfuze_regulators = pfuze3000_regulators; + pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze3000_regulators; regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze3000_regulators); sw_check_start = PFUZE3000_SW2; sw_check_end = PFUZE3000_SW2; sw_hi = 1 << 3; break; case PFUZE200: - pfuze_regulators = pfuze200_regulators; + pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze200_regulators; regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze200_regulators); sw_check_start = PFUZE200_SW2; sw_check_end = PFUZE200_SW3B; break; case PFUZE100: default: - pfuze_regulators = pfuze100_regulators; + pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze100_regulators; regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze100_regulators); sw_check_start = PFUZE100_SW2; sw_check_end = PFUZE100_SW4; @@ -587,7 +586,7 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client, (pfuze_chip->chip_id == PFUZE100) ? "100" : ((pfuze_chip->chip_id == PFUZE200) ? "200" : "3000")); - memcpy(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs, pfuze_regulators, + memcpy(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs, pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators, sizeof(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs)); ret = pfuze_parse_regulators_dt(pfuze_chip); @@ -631,7 +630,7 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client, devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config); if (IS_ERR(pfuze_chip->regulators[i])) { dev_err(&client->dev, "register regulator%s failed\n", - pfuze_regulators[i].desc.name); + pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators[i].desc.name); return PTR_ERR(pfuze_chip->regulators[i]); } } -- 2.8.1