From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760832AbbA1DBp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:01:45 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:60099 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbbA1DBo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:01:44 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,478,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="668739786" From: "Wu, Feng" To: "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , "gleb@kernel.org" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "jiang.liu@linux.intel.com" CC: "eric.auger@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Wu, Feng" Subject: RE: [v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Thread-Topic: [v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Thread-Index: AQHQFh/MLVqZuVHeo0y8FKdj3kp1QpzKDcWggAsStYA= Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:01:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1418397300-10870-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Feng > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:26 AM > To: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com; x86@kernel.org; > gleb@kernel.org; pbonzini@redhat.com; dwmw2@infradead.org; > joro@8bytes.org; alex.williamson@redhat.com; jiang.liu@linux.intel.com > Cc: eric.auger@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wu, Feng > Subject: RE: [v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Feng > > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:15 PM > > To: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com; > x86@kernel.org; > > gleb@kernel.org; pbonzini@redhat.com; dwmw2@infradead.org; > > joro@8bytes.org; alex.williamson@redhat.com; jiang.liu@linux.intel.com > > Cc: eric.auger@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wu, Feng > > Subject: [v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support > > > > VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt. > > With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from > > direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM > > intervention when guest is running in non-root mode. > > > > You can find the VT-d Posted-Interrtups Spec. in the following URL: > > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technolog > > y/vt-directed-io-spec.html > > > > v1->v2: > > * Use VFIO framework to enable this feature, the VFIO part of this series is > > base on Eric's patch "[PATCH v3 0/8] KVM-VFIO IRQ forward control" > > * Rebase this patchset on > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git, > > then revise some irq logic based on the new hierarchy irqdomain patches > > provided > > by Jiang Liu > > > > v2->v3: > > * Adjust the Posted-interrupts Descriptor updating logic when vCPU is > > preempted or blocked. > > * KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_POSTING_IRQ --> > > KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_POST_IRQ > > * __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_KVM_VFIO_POSTING --> > > __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_KVM_VFIO_POST > > * Add KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_UNPOST_IRQ attribute for VFIO irq, which > > can be used to change back to remapping mode. > > * Fix typo > > > > This patch series is made of the following groups: > > 1-6: Some preparation changes in iommu and irq component, this is based on > > the > > new hierarchy irqdomain logic. > > 7-9, 26: IOMMU changes for VT-d Posted-Interrupts, such as, feature > > detection, > > command line parameter. > > 10-17, 22-25: Changes related to KVM itself. > > 18-20: Changes in VFIO component, this part was previously sent out as > > "[RFC PATCH v2 0/2] kvm-vfio: implement the vfio skeleton for VT-d > > Posted-Interrupts" > > 21: x86 irq related changes > > > > Feng Wu (26): > > genirq: Introduce irq_set_vcpu_affinity() to target an interrupt to a > > VCPU > > iommu: Add new member capability to struct irq_remap_ops > > iommu, x86: Define new irte structure for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > iommu, x86: Implement irq_set_vcpu_affinity for intel_ir_chip > > x86, irq: Implement irq_set_vcpu_affinity for pci_msi_ir_controller > > iommu, x86: No need to migrating irq for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > iommu, x86: Add cap_pi_support() to detect VT-d PI capability > > iommu, x86: Add intel_irq_remapping_capability() for Intel > > iommu, x86: define irq_remapping_cap() > > KVM: change struct pi_desc for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > KVM: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts > > KVM: Initialize VT-d Posted-Interrupts Descriptor > > KVM: Define a new interface kvm_find_dest_vcpu() for VT-d PI > > KVM: Get Posted-Interrupts descriptor address from struct kvm_vcpu > > KVM: add interfaces to control PI outside vmx > > KVM: Make struct kvm_irq_routing_table accessible > > KVM: make kvm_set_msi_irq() public > > KVM: kvm-vfio: User API for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > KVM: kvm-vfio: implement the VFIO skeleton for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > KVM: x86: kvm-vfio: VT-d posted-interrupts setup > > x86, irq: Define a global vector for VT-d Posted-Interrupts > > KVM: Define a wakeup worker thread for vCPU > > KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU is preempted > > KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU is blocked > > KVM: Suppress posted-interrupt when 'SN' is set > > iommu/vt-d: Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts > > > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 1 + > > Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt | 9 ++ > > arch/x86/include/asm/entry_arch.h | 2 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 2 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/irq_remapping.h | 11 ++ > > arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++ > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c | 1 + > > arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 2 + > > arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 27 ++++ > > arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c | 2 + > > arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kvm/kvm_vfio_x86.c | 77 +++++++++ > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 244 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 ++- > > drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 68 +++++++- > > drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.c | 24 ++- > > drivers/iommu/irq_remapping.h | 8 + > > include/linux/dmar.h | 32 ++++ > > include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 1 + > > include/linux/irq.h | 7 + > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 46 ++++++ > > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 11 ++ > > kernel/irq/chip.c | 14 ++ > > kernel/irq/manage.c | 20 +++ > > virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 43 ++++- > > virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 11 -- > > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 15 ++ > > virt/kvm/vfio.c | 107 +++++++++++++ > > 30 files changed, 795 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_vfio_x86.c > > > > Hi Paolo, Alex, and other maintainers, > > Since this series contain multiple subsystems, IOMMU, irq, x86, VFIO, KVM, etc. > I am wondering how you guys handled this case before? If all the patches are > reviewed and acked by the associated maintainer, are you only merge the > patches > related to your own subsystem to your tree? However, you may also need get > other > patches to make the build successful, so I am a little curious about how you guys > handle this? Thanks a lot! Can anyone share some experiences about this? Thanks, Feng > > Thanks, > Feng > > > -- > > 1.9.1