linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
To: George Spelvin <lkml@SDF.ORG>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 08/50] fs/ext4/ialloc.c: Replace % with reciprocal_scale() TO BE VERIFIED
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:10:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EC88E8EB-7303-45FB-85B9-A007FBE5F5A0@dilger.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200328231536.GA11951@SDF.ORG>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1870 bytes --]

On Mar 28, 2020, at 5:15 PM, George Spelvin <lkml@SDF.ORG> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 04:56:17PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> 
>> So I think the current patch is fine.  The for-loop construct of
>> using "++g == ngroups && (g = 0)" to wrap "g" around is new to me,
>> but looks correct.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
> 
> Thank you.  Standing back and looking from higher altitude, I missed
> a second modulo at fallback_retry: which should be made consistent,
> so I need a one re-spin.
> 
> Also, we could, if desired, eliminate the i variable entirely
> using the fact that we have a copy of the starting position cached
> in parent_group.  I.e.
> 
> 		g = parent_group = reciprocal_scale(grp, ngroups);
> -		for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++, ++g == ngroups && (g = 0)) {
> +		do {
> 			...
> -		}
> +			if (++g == ngroups)
> +				g = 0;
> +		} while (g != parent_group);
> 
> Or perhaps the following would be simpler, replacing the modulo
> with a conditional subtract:
> 
> -		g = parent_group = reciprocal_scale(grp, ngroups);
> +		parent_group = reciprocal_scale(grp, ngroups);
> -		for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++, ++g == ngroups && (g = 0)) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
> +			g = parent_group + i;
> +			if (g >= ngroups)
> +				g -= ngroups;
> 
> The conditional branch starts out always false, and ends up always true,
> but except for a few bobbles when it switches, branch prediction should
> handle it very well.
> 
> Any preference?

I was looking at whether we could use a for-loop without "i"?  Something like:

	for (g = parent_group + 1; g != parent_group; ++g >= ngroups && (g = 0))

The initial group is parent_group + 1, to avoid special-casing when the
initial parent_group = 0 (which would prevent the loop from terminating).

Cheers, Andreas






[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 873 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-29  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19  1:32 [RFC PATCH v1 08/50] fs/ext4/ialloc.c: Replace % with reciprocal_scale() TO BE VERIFIED George Spelvin
2020-03-28 22:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2020-03-28 23:15   ` George Spelvin
2020-03-29  0:10     ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2020-03-29  4:00       ` George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EC88E8EB-7303-45FB-85B9-A007FBE5F5A0@dilger.ca \
    --to=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@SDF.ORG \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).