From: "Roger Heflin" <rheflin@atipa.com>
To: "'Lennart Sorensen'" <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
"'Sander'" <sander@humilis.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: [OT] 8-port AHCI SATA Controller?
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:48:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EXCHG2003yL2m9lHiu3000010e0@EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060131185804.GM18970@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> Lennart Sorensen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:58 PM
> To: Sander
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jgarzik@pobox.com
> Subject: Re: [OT] 8-port AHCI SATA Controller?
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Sander wrote:
> > Actually, I need 24 ports :-) But 3x SX8 sets me back 540 dollars
> > according to pricewatch, which is less than half.
>
> I know with older promise controllers, it wasn't possible to
> run more than 2 in one system as far as I remember due to
> some dma issues. Not sure if that applies to the SX8.
>
> If it turns out the SX8 has issues (like the one pointed out
> earlier about number of commands to the card at once) or that
> it can't have 3 cards in one system at once, then what? Are
> you then out $540 + the cost of a better controller?
> Certainly worth finding out before spending the money.
>
> > Fakeraid controllers are less expensive, and would do too of course
> > :-)
>
> Of course those aren't hardware, and are only meant for small
> toy raids for windows users. The rest of use treat them as
> ide/sata controllers only. I haven't seen one of those with
> more than 4 ports either. If the SX8 is one, then I must
> admit I haven't looked at it before. I try to avoid hardware
> from promise whenever possible.
>
Highpoint has some that I believe are software raidish.
They do have on-board parity generators that are used when
you use there binary only modules.
I have heard that they will work with later kernels (2.6.15+)
since the highpoint are a standard Marvell chipset, and they
seem to be fairly price competitive with JBOD raid controllers,
and have some controllers that have more than 8 ports, the price
per port may be better on the larger controllers.
Using 3 disk software stripe (linux) or 3 disks software stripe
(binary modules) I have got IO rates of 135MB/second sustained
over 90-100 GB read/write tests.
Roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-31 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-31 11:53 [OT] 8-port AHCI SATA Controller? Sander
2006-01-31 16:39 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 17:17 ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:30 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 18:39 ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:44 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 18:50 ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:58 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 20:48 ` Roger Heflin [this message]
2006-02-01 10:15 ` Sander
2006-02-01 14:53 ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-01 10:03 ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:40 ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-01-31 18:51 ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:19 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-01-31 18:56 ` Sander
2006-01-31 19:02 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-02-01 10:18 ` Sander
2006-01-31 20:38 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-31 20:48 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-01-31 20:59 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-31 21:31 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-02-01 16:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-01 19:15 ` Joshua Kugler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EXCHG2003yL2m9lHiu3000010e0@EXCHG2003.microtech-ks.com \
--to=rheflin@atipa.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=sander@humilis.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).