From: "Grover, Andrew" <email@example.com> To: "Mikael Pettersson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>, "Brown, Len" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com> Subject: RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:11:17 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A8470255EE91@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com> (raw) > From: Mikael Pettersson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > I would like to see HT_ONLY generalized to parsing the MADT for > I/O-APICs. The problem I have is that some mainboards, like my > i850 ASUS P4T-E, have I/O-APICs but no MP tables. The only way for > the Linux kernel to discover the I/O-APICs on these mainboard is > through MADT parsing. > > However, this currently requires me to enable all of ACPI, which > I don't need or want for many reasons, including code bloat and > behavioural side-effects. > > Replacing "HT_ONLY" with "MADT_PARSING_ONLY" would be ideal, IMO. This won't help you. If you have *no* MPS tables, then you need ACPI (and specifically the ability to execute the _PRT control methods) for interrupt routing information, in addition to ioapic and local apic (CPU) enumeration. If this wasn't the case, I'm sure someone would have implemented ioapic MADT enumeration code long ago. Also, nothing is going to fundamentally change the size of the ACPI code (but we do keep chipping away at it, as evidenced by the dynamic SDT patch, -Os, etc.) but I'd like to hear more about the behavioral side-effects you'd mentioned, with an eye towards fixing them. Regards -- Andy
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-15 18:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-07-15 19:11 Grover, Andrew [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-07-16 20:55 Mikael Pettersson 2003-07-16 20:36 Grover, Andrew 2003-07-16 9:47 Mikael Pettersson 2003-07-16 2:35 Brown, Len 2003-07-15 18:49 Mikael Pettersson 2003-07-15 18:07 Brown, Len 2003-07-15 19:02 ` Hugh Dickins 2003-07-15 17:21 Grover, Andrew 2003-07-15 17:38 ` Hugh Dickins 2003-07-15 16:53 Grover, Andrew 2003-07-15 17:11 ` Hugh Dickins 2003-07-15 17:57 ` Tugrul Galatali
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A8470255EE91@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).