From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271105AbTGPUV6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:21:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271106AbTGPUV6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:21:58 -0400 Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6]:28912 "EHLO hermes.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271105AbTGPUV5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:21:57 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:36:10 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ACPI patches updated (20030714) Thread-Index: AcNLf0CyROeOsYOfSPqjg1JQirv2ywAWSxTA From: "Grover, Andrew" To: "Mikael Pettersson" , , "Brown, Len" Cc: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2003 20:36:11.0160 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4971980:01C34BD9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Mikael Pettersson [mailto:mikpe@csd.uu.se] > Concerning code size, the 70K number in ACPI's Kconfig help is > out of date. A minimal ACPI (all user-selectable suboptions > disabled) adds 145K to my 2.6.0-test1 kernel. Are you talking to the compressed or uncompressed kernel? Maybe we got it backwards, but the 70K number was the bzImage size difference. (Actually I just tried it again. We're 80K now. I blame gcc. ;-)) (And of course, since the kernel (incl. ACPI) dynamically allocates memory, even the uncompressed kernel image doesn't account for the kernel's true memory footprint...) Regards -- Andy