From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265036AbTFYUVJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:21:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265038AbTFYUVI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:21:08 -0400 Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([134.134.136.7]:39642 "EHLO caduceus.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265036AbTFYUVC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:21:02 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.4] ACPI_HT_ONLY acpismp=force Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:35:11 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH 2.4] ACPI_HT_ONLY acpismp=force Thread-Index: AcM7V+HrSyU29GbBQo2rRnpwLF/V3gAAOttg From: "Grover, Andrew" To: "Hugh Dickins" Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" , "Andrew Morton" , "Marcelo Tosatti" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2003 20:35:12.0127 (UTC) FILETIME=[46BAA0F0:01C33B59] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Hugh Dickins [mailto:hugh@veritas.com] > What's the point of bootparam "acpismp=force"? A way to change > your mind if you just said "acpi=off"? A hurdle to jump to get > CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY to do what you ask? 2.4.18 used to need it to > enable HT, but not recent releases. It can't configure in what's > not there, and now serves only to confuse: kill it. Sounds good to me. I was confused about the necessity of keeping acpismp=force around. Sorry bout that. Thanks -- Regards -- Andy