From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
<saberlily.xia@hisilicon.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mm: cma: introduce a non-blocking version of cma_release()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:42:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F8551A10-E254-44FC-B28E-9E7F8AC14B57@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022225308.2927890-1-guro@fb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]
On 22 Oct 2020, at 18:53, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This small patchset introduces a non-blocking version of cma_release()
> and simplifies the code in hugetlbfs, where previously we had to
> temporarily drop hugetlb_lock around the cma_release() call.
>
> It should help Zi Yan on his work on 1 GB THPs: splitting a gigantic
> THP under a memory pressure requires a cma_release() call. If it's
Thanks for the patch. But during 1GB THP split, we only clear
the bitmaps without releasing the pages. Also in cma_release_nowait(),
the first page in the allocated CMA region is reused to store
struct cma_clear_bitmap_work, but the same method cannot be used
during THP split, since the first page is still in-use. We might
need to allocate some new memory for struct cma_clear_bitmap_work,
which might not be successful under memory pressure. Any suggestion
on where to store struct cma_clear_bitmap_work when I only want to
clear bitmap without releasing the pages?
Thanks.
—
Best Regards,
Yan Zi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 22:53 [PATCH v1 0/2] mm: cma: introduce a non-blocking version of cma_release() Roman Gushchin
2020-10-22 22:53 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm: cma: introduce cma_release_nowait() Roman Gushchin
2020-10-24 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-27 19:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-10-22 22:53 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: hugetlb: don't drop hugetlb_lock around cma_release() call Roman Gushchin
2020-10-22 23:42 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2020-10-23 0:47 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] mm: cma: introduce a non-blocking version of cma_release() Roman Gushchin
2020-10-23 0:58 ` Zi Yan
2020-10-23 20:55 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F8551A10-E254-44FC-B28E-9E7F8AC14B57@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=saberlily.xia@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).