From: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] signal: add procfd_signal() syscall
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 14:20:37 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F9EBD99D-0339-4AD6-B89B-84F164454336@brauner.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWcUQC_aeHRwVF0yr8GATndRU9277rQQ+caOcR1uJ1W9g@mail.gmail.com>
On December 1, 2018 12:46:22 PM GMT+13:00, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM Christian Brauner
><christian@brauner.io> wrote:
>>
>> On December 1, 2018 12:12:53 PM GMT+13:00, Arnd Bergmann
><arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> >On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:05 AM Daniel Colascione
><dancol@google.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:26 PM Christian Brauner
>> ><christian@brauner.io> wrote:
>> >> > On December 1, 2018 11:09:58 AM GMT+13:00, Arnd Bergmann
>> ><arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > One humble point I would like to make is that what I care about
>> >most is a sensible way forward without having to redo essential
>parts
>> >of how syscalls work.
>> >> > I don't want to introduce a sane, small syscall that ends up
>> >breaking all over the place because we decided to fix past mistakes
>> >that technically have nothing to do with the patch itself.
>> >> > However, I do sympathize and understand these concerns.
>> >>
>> >> IMHO, it's fine to just replicate all the splits we have for the
>> >> existing signal system calls. It's ugly, but once it's done, it'll
>be
>> >> done for a long time. I can't see a need to add even more signal
>> >> system calls after this one.
>> >
>> >We definitely need waitid_time64() and rt_sigtimedwait_time64()
>> >in the very near future.
>>
>> Right, I remember you pointing this out in a prior mail.
>> Thanks for working on this for such a long time now, Arnd!
>> Can we agree to move on with the procfd syscall given the current
>constraints?
>> I just don't want to see the syscall being
>> blocked by a generic problem whose
>> ultimate solution is to get rid of weird
>> architectural constraints.
>
>Creating and using a copy_siginfo_from_user64() function would work
>for everyone, no?
Meaning, no compat syscalls, introduce
new struct siginfo64_t and the copy
function you named above?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-01 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 10:51 [PATCH v2] signal: add procfd_signal() syscall Christian Brauner
2018-11-20 10:51 ` [PATCH v2] procfd_signal.2: document procfd_signal syscall Christian Brauner
2018-11-22 8:00 ` [PATCH v2] signal: add procfd_signal() syscall Serge E. Hallyn
2018-11-22 8:23 ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-28 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-29 12:28 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-29 16:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 19:16 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-29 19:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 19:55 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-29 20:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 21:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-29 21:35 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-29 21:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 2:40 ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-12-01 1:25 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 5:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-30 6:56 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 11:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 16:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-30 21:57 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 22:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 22:26 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 23:05 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-30 23:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 23:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 23:37 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 23:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-01 1:20 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2018-11-30 23:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-01 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-01 9:17 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-01 10:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-01 13:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-12-01 14:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-12-01 15:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-12-01 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-01 16:27 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-02 0:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-12-02 1:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-02 8:52 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-30 23:52 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-02 10:03 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-03 16:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-03 18:02 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-04 6:03 ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-12-04 12:55 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-04 13:26 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-06 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-06 18:56 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-06 19:03 ` Christian Brauner
2018-12-25 5:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-12-25 7:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-12-25 12:07 ` Aleksa Sarai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F9EBD99D-0339-4AD6-B89B-84F164454336@brauner.io \
--to=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).