linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huaisheng HS1 Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"mhocko@suse.com" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	"alexander.levin@verizon.com" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>,
	"colyli@suse.de" <colyli@suse.de>,
	NingTing Cheng <chengnt@lenovo.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [External]  Re: [PATCH v1] include/linux/gfp.h: getting rid of GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:12:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <HK2PR03MB1684A881A868E9676C7E55E692920@HK2PR03MB1684.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180512142249.GA24215@bombadil.infradead.org>

> From: Matthew Wilcox [mailto:willy@infradead.org]
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 10:23 PM> 
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:35:00AM +0000, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
> > > The point of this exercise is to actually encode the zone number in
> > > the bottom bits of the GFP flags instead of something which has to be
> > > interpreted into a zone number.  When somebody sets __GFP_MOVABLE, they
> > > should also be setting ZONE_MOVABLE:
> > >
> > > -#define __GFP_MOVABLE   ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_MOVABLE)  /* ZONE_MOVABLE allowed
> */
> > > +#define __GFP_MOVABLE   ((__force gfp_t)(___GFP_MOVABLE | (ZONE_MOVABLE ^
> ZONE_NORMAL)))
> > >
> > I am afraid we couldn't do that, because __GFP_MOVABLE would be used potentially
> with other __GFPs like __GFP_DMA and __GFP_DMA32.
> 
> That's not a combination that makes much sense.  I know it's permitted today
> (and it has the effect of being a no-op), but when you think about it, it
> doesn't actually make any sense.

Yes, you are right.
After checking almost all references of __GFP_MOVABLE and other __GFP_* flags, perhaps I was far to get excessive pursuit of logical correctness.
For those nonsense combinations, I should ignore them.
Current GFP_ZONE_TABLE can ensure all logical correctness. That makes me want to pursue same effect.

Next, I will revise the patch according to your advice, then try to get overall testing result as far as possible.
There are many combinations because of a lot of conditions in file system and drivers. Hope I could test all things related to the lower 4 bits of gfp.

Sincerely,
Huaisheng Ye

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1525968625-40825-1-git-send-email-yehs1@lenovo.com>
2018-05-10 16:30 ` [PATCH v1] include/linux/gfp.h: getting rid of GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-11  3:24   ` [External] " Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-11 13:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-12 11:35       ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-12 14:22         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-16 12:12           ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye [this message]
2018-05-18  3:03       ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=HK2PR03MB1684A881A868E9676C7E55E692920@HK2PR03MB1684.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yehs1@lenovo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
    --cc=chengnt@lenovo.com \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).