From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 14:33:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 14:33:02 -0400 Received: from isimail.interactivesi.com ([207.8.4.3]:18188 "HELO dinero.interactivesi.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 14:32:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:32:36 -0500 From: Timur Tabi To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <9LUWoC.A.W3G.sIQQ7@dinero.interactivesi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Timur Tabi's message of "3 Jul 2001 01:29:40 +0200" Subject: Re: pte_val(*pte) as lvalue X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.19a; build=73 Message-ID: X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ** Reply to message from Andi Kleen on 03 Jul 2001 01:33:42 +0200 > Timur Tabi writes: > > > > > What is the accepted way to assign an integer to a pte that works in 2.2 and > > 2.4? > > set_pte(pte, mk_pte( ... )) I'm not sure how to use mk_pte. The first parameter is a struct page *, which I don't have. All I'm doing is modifying the PTE value. I don't want to "make" another one. -- Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com