From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271393AbTGXAGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:06:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271394AbTGXAGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:06:31 -0400 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:21903 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271393AbTGXAG1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:06:27 -0400 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Andre Hedrick" , "Roman Zippel" Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: RE: Promise SATA driver GPL'd Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:21:19 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Freedom comes from keeping all of it free. All code released publically is free. The more code you release, the more freedom. You seem to think that how much freedom you have is based upon what percentage of code is free as opposed to how much free code there is. Nobody can reduce the amount of free code, so nobody can reduce your freedom. No matter how much code I write for which I don't give you the source, the amount of code for which you do have the source is not reduced. The more free code there is, the freer you are. The only thing that threatens your freedom is if someone makes free code unfree. How do they do that? If I add something and don't make it free, that doesn't reduce your freedom. It only fails to increase it. > Litigation is a means to prevent the blanket theift of today. > You cleary do not get it. The only thing a person can steal is what they themselves added. So no theft takes any of your freedom away. You are still free, no matter how many things that I produce I fail to give you. > How do you plan to stop people from making changes to the kernel, > packaging a binary kernel and selling it? Would I be any better off if they didn't make the changes in the first place? How can someone not giving me access to something they produced make me any less free than if those things didn't exist at all? Nobody can take your freedom away just by denying you something that they produced. DS