RE: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: inside-secure - fix uninitialized-variable warning

[Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 8:40 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Antoine
> Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>; Kees Cook
> <keescook@chromium.org>; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: inside-secure - fix uninitialized-variable warning
> 
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:08 PM Pascal Van Leeuwen
> <pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > >
> > >  config CRYPTO_DEV_SAFEXCEL
> > >       tristate "Inside Secure's SafeXcel cryptographic engine driver"
> > > -     depends on OF || PCI || COMPILE_TEST
> > > +     depends on OF || PCI
> > >
> >
> > This seems like it just ignores the problem by not allowing compile testing
> > anymore? Somehow that does not feel right ...
> 
> No, it just ignores the uninteresting case. You can compile-test this on
> any architecture by turning on OF.
> 
You are entirely correct. Because of the COMPILE_TEST it could be compiled
without either OF or PCI support, which makes no sense whatsoever ...

> > >       select CRYPTO_LIB_AES
> > >       select CRYPTO_AUTHENC
> > >       select CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-
> > > secure/safexcel.c
> > > index e12a2a3a5422..9c0bce77de14 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
> > > @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ static int safexcel_request_ring_irq(void *pdev, int irqid,
> > >       struct device *dev;
> > >
> > >       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI) && is_pci_dev) {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> > >
> >
> > The whole point was NOT to use regular #ifdefs such that the code can
> > be compile tested without needing to switch configurations.
> > There is already a different solution in the works involving some empty
> > inline stubs for those pci routines, please see an earlier mail by Herbert
> > titled "PCI: Add stub pci_irq_vector and others".
> 
> Ah, good. That should take care of most of the problems. I think
> we still need the Kconfig change, unless the safexcel_init()
> function is also changed to use if(IS_ENABLED()) checks
> instead of #if.
> 
>      Arnd
>
Yes, I agree.


Regards,
Pascal van Leeuwen
Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Verimatrix
www.insidesecure.com