From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:12:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:12:19 -0400 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:38115 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:12:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] Re: severe FS corruption with 2.4.6-pre2 + IBM jfs 0.3.4 patch To: Andi Kleen Cc: Alan Cox , jfs-discussion@dwoss.lotus.com, Jeff Garzik , lkml , David Mansfield X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Steve Best" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:11:54 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NM201/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 06/15/2001 09:11:54 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:55:05AM Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:25:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Alan Cox wrote: >> > >> > > It's probably a JFS issue, but I thought I'd report this in case someone >> > > is collecting and correlating filesystem corruption messages (Alan?). >> > > Here is my sad story. >> > >> > I get as far as 'using jfs' and delete them >> >> Understandable but FWIW they have apparently passed a night of >> stress-kernel (cerberus) testing on the latest jfs.. > rm -rf not working correctly is a kind of show stopper bug ATM though. > Hopefully it can be fixed soon. Andi, The rm -rf problem is our topic priority and should be fixed in less that a week. Steve