From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:46:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:46:05 -0500 Received: from d12lmsgate-4.de.ibm.com ([194.196.100.237]:36259 "EHLO d12lmsgate-4.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:46:03 -0500 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] s390 (1/7): s390 arch fixes. To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Martin Schwidefsky" Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:55:12 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12ML016/12/M/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at 10/03/2003 09:56:28 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Are you sure it's not "last = resume(prev, next);"? > > -- Pete switch_to is called in context_switch as follows: switch_to(prev, next, prev); At the moment it doesn't matter but thinking about the meaning of the parameter names your are probably right. This should better be last = resume(prev, next). blue skies, Martin