linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:21:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OFE5212A1C.B62E8E51-ONC125772F.00371EE7-C125772F.0038EEC8@transmode.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100526171424.447fac18.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote on 2010/05/26 09:14:24:
>
> Hi Andrew, Joakim,
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:41:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:29:45 +0200 Joakim Tjernlund
> <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote:
> >
> > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote on 2010/05/26 06:09:00:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:20:40 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-
> foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > hmpf.  Does this fix?
> > > >
> > > > No.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that __LITTLE_ENDIAN is only defined in
> > > > linux/byteorder/little_endian.h which is only included by little endian
> > > > architectures ...
> > >
> > > Ah, not sure how to fix this ATM. Perhaps best to revert
> > >    crc32: use __BYTE_ORDER macro for endian detection
> > > for now.
> >
> > yup.
>
> We also need to revert b3b77c8caef1750ebeea1054e39e358550ea9f55 ("endian:
> #define __BYTE_ORDER") in order to get rid of the other warning I pointed out:
>
> In file included from fs/jfs/jfs_types.h:33,
>                  from fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h:26,
>                  from fs/jfs/file.c:22:
> fs/jfs/endian24.h:36:101: warning: "__LITTLE_ENDIAN" is not defined
>
> I get this warning on powerpc builds for most of the files in fs/jfs ...

endian24.h has:
#if (defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)) || (defined(__BYTE_ORDER) && (__BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN))
That won't work for BE CPU's. Perhaps something like this will?
#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) && defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) && (__BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN) || defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)

The kernel borrows __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN from user space but does not impl. the
full semantics that user space has. Adding full user space semantics isn't easy as it clashes with
current use of __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN.

If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER,
into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and
move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN

 Jocke


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-26 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-26  1:05 linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26  1:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-26  4:09   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26  6:29     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-05-26  6:41       ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-26  7:14         ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26 10:21           ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2010-05-26 15:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26 16:35               ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-05-26 16:46                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26 17:31                   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-05-26 17:45                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26 15:33           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26 15:26         ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-30  5:26 linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-15  3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-15 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-05  9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-05  9:29 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-21  1:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] ` <ANQAFAC9EhHeWK1g5-2FP4ol.9.1634779695838.Hmail.changfengnan@vivo.com>
2021-10-21  1:32   ` 常凤楠
2021-08-30  8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-23  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-23  8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-18 20:58 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-18 22:47 ` Ernst, Justin
2021-02-23 21:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-23 22:01     ` Ernst, Justin
2021-01-03 22:07 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-28  3:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-28 15:56 ` Micah Morton
2020-10-28 21:07   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-21  3:39 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-21  6:51 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-02 20:29 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-02 21:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-02 21:21   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-13 22:25 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-27 22:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-27 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-27 23:01   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-27 23:05     ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-10-27 23:25       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-27 23:40     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-29 21:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-30 19:05       ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-04-12 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-11  7:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-17 22:52 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18  2:54 ` Skidmore, Donald C
2012-10-24  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-28 19:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-11-05 22:36   ` Antti Palosaari
2012-04-24  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-24 17:09 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-17  0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-17  1:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-18 23:36 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-18 23:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-30  1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-30  2:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-26  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-25  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-26  7:15 ` Greg KH
2011-03-17 23:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-18  1:13 ` David Miller
2011-01-13 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-14  8:45 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2010-10-25  2:52 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-25  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-25  6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-25  0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-25  0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-25  2:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-16  4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-28  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26  1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26  1:51 ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-26  1:54   ` David Miller
2010-05-25  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-25  4:58 ` David Miller
2010-05-25 23:19   ` David Miller
2010-05-25 23:24     ` David Miller
2010-05-26  2:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-26 23:30 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-26 23:42 ` Greg KH
2010-04-27  3:09   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OFE5212A1C.B62E8E51-ONC125772F.00371EE7-C125772F.0038EEC8@transmode.se \
    --to=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).