From: Etienne CARRIERE <etienne.carriere@st.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
OP-TEE TrustedFirmware <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jerome Forissier <jerome@forissier.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Asynchronous notifications from secure world
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:05:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PAXPR10MB4687E737261282B78600272DFD189@PAXPR10MB4687.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
Hello Sudeep and all,
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 19:52, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> I was holding off you reply as I didn't have all the background on this.
> Achin did mention that this is preparatory work for FFA notifications.
> I did mention to him that this is more than that, it is custom extension
> to address what FF-A notification is trying to in standard way.
>
> I share same opinion as Marc Z.
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:22:23AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 18:16, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > I don't care about OP-TEE. If you are proposing a contract between S
> > > and NS, it has to be TEE and OS independent. That's how the
> > > architecture works.
> > >
> >
> > Agree, here we are not proposing a common contract among the S and NS
> > world that every TEE (based on Arm TrustZone) will use to communicate
> > with REE (Linux in our case) but rather an OP-TEE specific
> > notifications feature that is built on top of OP-TEE specific ABIs.
> >
> > And I can see your arguments coming from an FFA perspective but there
> > are platforms like the ones based on Armv7 which don't support FFA
> > ABI. Maybe Jens can elaborate how this feature will fit in when FFA
> > comes into picture?
> >
>
> I can understand that but won't those platforms add the support both in
> the kernel(current series) and secure world to address notifications.
> While you could argue that it is small extension to what is already present
> but I prefer they support FF-A is they need such a support instead of adding
> custom mechanisms. It is hard to maintain and each vendor will deviate
> from this custom mechanism and soon we will have bunch of them to handle.
There exist armv7-a platforms that expect OP-TEE notification support and will not move the FF-A, like the stm32mp15. This platform won't move to FF-A mainly due to the memory cost of the added SPM layer and the device physical constraints.
We have a usecase for OP-TEE notification. We're working on the integration of an SCMI server in OP-TEE. SCMI notification is a feature needed is this scope and it requires OP-TEE async notification means as those proposed here.
This OP-TEE async notif also brings a lot of value in OP-TEE as it allows a OP-TEE secure thread (i.e. executing a trusted application service) to gently wait on a secure interrupt (as a slow bus transaction completion or many other usecase) with the CPU relaxed. This support is provided by the proposed series. I believe existing device should be able to leverage this OP-TEE feature without needing their OP-TEE to move to the new FF-A interface.
Regards,
Etienne
>
> [...]
ST Restricted
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 8:05 Etienne CARRIERE [this message]
2021-07-13 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Asynchronous notifications from secure world Sudeep Holla
2021-07-20 6:45 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-07-20 7:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-20 9:59 ` Jens Wiklander
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-16 10:36 Jens Wiklander
2021-06-17 4:33 ` Sumit Garg
2021-06-17 6:10 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-07-06 7:25 ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-06 10:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-06 11:39 ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-06 12:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-07 5:52 ` Sumit Garg
2021-07-07 6:54 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-07-07 17:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-08 12:56 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PAXPR10MB4687E737261282B78600272DFD189@PAXPR10MB4687.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=etienne.carriere@st.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jerome@forissier.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).