From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: kimbrownkd <kimbrownkd@gmail.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add mutex lock to channel show functions
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 03:46:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PU1P153MB0169EB8CFC0A69407A8AE2C2BF980@PU1P153MB0169.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190122020759.GA4054@ubu-Virtual-Machine>
> From: Kimberly Brown <kimbrownkd@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 6:08 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add mutex lock to channel show functions
>
> The channel level "_show" functions are vulnerable to race conditions.
> Add a mutex lock and unlock around the call to the channel level "_show"
> functions in vmbus_chan_attr_show().
>
> This problem was discussed here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/830
>
> --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> @@ -1414,6 +1414,7 @@ static ssize_t vmbus_chan_attr_show(struct kobject
> *kobj,
> = container_of(attr, struct vmbus_chan_attribute, attr);
> const struct vmbus_channel *chan
> = container_of(kobj, struct vmbus_channel, kobj);
> + ssize_t ret;
>
> if (!attribute->show)
> return -EIO;
> @@ -1421,7 +1422,10 @@ static ssize_t vmbus_chan_attr_show(struct
> kobject *kobj,
> if (chan->state != CHANNEL_OPENED_STATE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return attribute->show(chan, buf);
> + mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> + ret = attribute->show(chan, buf);
> + mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> + return ret;
> }
It looks this patch is already able to fix the original issue:
6712cc9c2211 ("vmbus: don't return values for uninitalized channels"),
as chan->state can't be CHANNEL_OPENED_STATE when
channel->ringbuffer_page is not set up yet, or has been freed.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-22 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-22 2:07 [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add mutex lock to channel show functions Kimberly Brown
2019-01-22 3:46 ` Dexuan Cui [this message]
2019-01-22 6:42 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-01-22 18:40 ` Dexuan Cui
2019-01-28 19:58 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-01-29 19:20 ` Dexuan Cui
2019-01-31 15:19 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-31 16:45 ` Michael Kelley
2019-01-31 17:47 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-02-01 14:13 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-01 18:24 ` Dexuan Cui
2019-02-02 20:07 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-02-15 1:54 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-15 2:27 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-02-22 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix a race condition vulnerability in "_show" functions Kimberly Brown
2019-02-22 3:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Refactor chan->state if statement Kimberly Brown
2019-02-24 16:54 ` Michael Kelley
2019-02-22 3:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add a channel ring buffer mutex lock Kimberly Brown
2019-02-24 16:53 ` Michael Kelley
2019-02-26 6:24 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-14 20:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix a race condition in "_show" functions Kimberly Brown
2019-03-14 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Refactor chan->state if statement Kimberly Brown
2019-03-14 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Set ring_info field to 0 and remove memset Kimberly Brown
2019-03-29 16:01 ` Michael Kelley
2019-03-14 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix race condition with new ring_buffer_info mutex Kimberly Brown
2019-03-14 22:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-17 1:49 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-20 20:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-21 3:47 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-21 16:04 ` Michael Kelley
2019-03-28 4:30 ` Kimberly Brown
2019-03-28 18:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-29 16:04 ` Michael Kelley
2019-04-10 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix a race condition in "_show" functions Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PU1P153MB0169EB8CFC0A69407A8AE2C2BF980@PU1P153MB0169.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kimbrownkd@gmail.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).