From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261353AbVBNGN1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:13:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261357AbVBNGN1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:13:27 -0500 Received: from www.missl.cs.umd.edu ([128.8.126.38]:46864 "EHLO www.missl.cs.umd.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261353AbVBNGNM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:13:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:17:06 -0500 (EST) From: Adam Sulmicki X-X-Sender: adam@www.missl.cs.umd.edu To: Matthew Jacob cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb050213220265431452@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <7579f7fb050213220265431452@mail.gmail.com> X-WEB: http://www.eax.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Matthew Jacob wrote: > I'm curious why you'd have a non-compete for 1 year for just using BK. Larry likes to participate in flamewars on LKML ? :-) > That would make BK more or less unique amongst packages, no?