From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:44:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:44:46 -0500 Received: from delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl ([213.192.72.1]:47577 "EHLO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:44:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:54:34 +0100 (MET) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Mikael Pettersson cc: Pavel Machek , John Levon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Switch APIC (+nmi, +oprofile) to driver model In-Reply-To: <15948.50644.705291.922086@kim.it.uu.se> Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > My goal was to not change any behaviour from our current code, and from > what I can tell, our current code does not support PM suspend and resume > for old external-local-APIC machines. (They're mostly 486 MPs, right?) Both i486 and Pentium (typically for quad support, etc.). > The suspend/resume procedures only work on P6/K7 and up. There's a > bug there in that we may try to run the suspend on a UP P5 with enabled > local APIC, which won't work. So far, no one seems to have noticed :-> OK, but then the question is: are the following calls: + driver_register(&local_apic_driver); + return sys_device_register(&device_local_apic); for suspend/resume exclusively? -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +