linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james rich <james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu>
To: Tom Sightler <ttsig@tuxyturvy.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Questions about Enterprise Storage with Linux
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 00:22:37 -0700 (MST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10103080016480.9469-100000@pipt.oz.cc.utah.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006301c0a765$3ca118e0$1601a8c0@zeusinc.com>

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:

> 2.  Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
> large files over NFS?
> 
> 3.  What filesystem would be best for such large volumes?  We currently use
> reirserfs on our internal system, but they generally have filesystems in the
> 18-30GB ranges and we're talking about potentially 10-20x that.  Should we
> look at JFS/XFS or others?

I think that for filesystems this size you definately want to look at XFS
of JFS.  Maybe you will decide not to use them - but you should test them.

I am currently using XFS and it really works.  It currently has some
issues when used with raid 1, but it is probably the most suited for what
you want.  Exporting an XFS volume over NFS is no problem.  You can also
use xfs_growfs to change the size of your XFS partition.  I haven't had
any instability during all the time I've used XFS.

James Rich
james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-03-08  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-07 23:13 Linux 2.4.2ac14 Alan Cox
2001-03-08  0:40 ` Greg KH
2001-03-08  0:17   ` Questions about Enterprise Storage with Linux Tom Sightler
2001-03-08  2:11     ` Jesse Pollard
2001-03-08  1:20       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-03-08  2:35       ` Tom Sightler
2001-03-08  6:00         ` Tim Moore
2001-03-08  5:09     ` Jauder Ho
2001-03-08  7:22     ` james rich [this message]
2001-03-09  0:29     ` Thomas Davis
2001-03-08  0:59   ` Linux 2.4.2ac14 Greg KH
2001-03-08 20:43   ` andersg
2001-03-08  0:43 ` [PATCH] " Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-03-08  1:26 ` Misspelled spinlock_prefetch for MK7 (was: Linux 2.4.2ac14) junio
2001-03-08  1:56   ` junio
2001-03-08  5:20 ` Linux 2.4.2ac14 Keitaro Yosimura
2001-03-08 12:12   ` Alan Cox
2001-03-08  7:37 ` Doug Ledford
2001-03-08 13:37 Questions about Enterprise Storage with Linux Jesse Pollard
2001-03-08 16:48 ` james rich
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103090725030.699-100000@penguin.homenet>
2001-03-09  7:37 ` Tigran Aivazian
2001-03-09 17:30 ` Jauder Ho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.05.10103080016480.9469-100000@pipt.oz.cc.utah.edu \
    --to=james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ttsig@tuxyturvy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).