From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:10:19 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:5033 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:10:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:10:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Richard Gooch cc: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] one of $BIGNUM devfs races In-Reply-To: <200108070051.f770pji27036@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: > More importantly, the loop you used doesn't protect insertions into > the table. So it's not safe on SMP. Nope. Allocation of entry itself is moved ahead of the loop, so we insert immediately after expanding the thing. > > PS: ObYourPropertyManager: karmic retribution? > > Um, retribution for putting in an awful lot of time developing devfs > (despite extreme hostility), at considerable personal sacrifice, and > being patient and civilised to those who flamed against it? My, how > I've been such a horrible person. Nah, not that. Not plugging the holes that need to be plugged. Admit it, there is some poetic justice in the situation. As for the repugnant comments - IMO your "On the top of that, I have a life" used in the context it was used in counts pretty high on that scale. You know, you are _not_ unique in that respect. Whatever. I just hope that this time all that mess will be fixed and by now I really don't care who does it and what does it take.