From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:19 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:7128 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:27:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Rik van Riel cc: Stephan von Krawczynski , Andreas Dilger , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > Just look at how he's now trying to force Al Viro into > implementing his ideas yesterday because he broke stuff > again... Rik, in case you've missed that, I can and do speak for myself. I had spent ten years dodging the draft; when I decide to get enlisted into something it will happen on _my_ decision and _my_ conditions. When I decide that I'm being forced into something I do not accept - you'll know it from posting with URL of forked tree. FWIW, I'm less than thrilled by the Andrea's patch, but it is salvagable. I'm also less than thrilled by the whole situation with VM - all sides of it. I seriously suspect that we need a limited multi-way fork in that area, so that you guys would stop stepping on each others' toes. I'm taking no part in your merry 5-way clusterfuck - sort that mess out between yourselves. Again, when I decide that situation is unacceptable for me - I'll simply fork the tree. I do _not_ appreciate being enlisted into anyone's holy wars, so unless you really want to go _way_ up in my personal shitlist (several positions below .ru DoD) - don't play politics in my vicinity.