linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Ryan Cumming <bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: more devfs fun (Piled Higher and Deeper)
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 08:16:12 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110280805220.24880-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BDBF9C8.8E1F96AB@linux-m68k.org>



On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Roman Zippel wrote:

> What about putting them somewhere in a CVS repository, so people can see
> what's going on and maybe even can help out?

Looks like I'll get around to creating a CVS repository starting at the
last known code in a couple of days anyway...

> BTW you should really do something about your coding style, your code is
> very confusing to read. I wouldn't care if it would be just some driver,
> but devfs is supposed to be a very important part, so it would be nice
> to use the same rules that apply to other important parts of the kernel.

Good luck.

BTW, Richard - the last one for tonight:

devfs_unregister() vs. get_vfs_inode().  The latter blocks, so devfs_lookup()
and devfs_d_revalidate() can give you a nasty surprise - entry gets
unregistered while we allocate the inode and there's no connection between
it and inode or dentry at that point.  Then we merrily get dentry/inode
tied to unregistered devfs_entry.  And that includes reference _to_ dentry.
Enjoy...


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-28 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-27 15:00 Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 15:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 17:12   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 17:42     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:00       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 18:13         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:26         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:02           ` more devfs fun Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:16             ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:50               ` more devfs fun (Piled Higher and Deeper) Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 20:06                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 21:09                   ` Ryan Cumming
2001-10-27 21:22                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-28  1:00                     ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-28  8:45                     ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28  9:54                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-28 12:27                       ` Roman Zippel
2001-10-28 13:16                         ` Alexander Viro [this message]
2001-10-28 22:31                       ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28 23:11                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 21:01                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  6:35                 ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:10                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  7:14                   ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:17                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06 20:14                     ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28 10:06               ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-06  5:21               ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  5:17             ` more devfs fun Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  5:06           ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:01         ` Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:03           ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-09  5:38           ` Devfs races with block devices Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:19         ` Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:22           ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:13       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 19:19         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:26           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:40           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:57             ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-10-29  5:38               ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-29  6:07                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-29  6:34                   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 21:42             ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.21.0110280805220.24880-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu \
    --to=viro@math.psu.edu \
    --cc=bodnar42@phalynx.dhs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgooch@atnf.csiro.au \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).