From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263382AbTDTJ6V (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:58:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263390AbTDTJ6V (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:58:21 -0400 Received: from mail2.sonytel.be ([195.0.45.172]:56760 "EHLO mail.sonytel.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263382AbTDTJ6U (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:58:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:09:37 +0200 (MEST) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" cc: Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? In-Reply-To: <20030419184120.GH669@gallifrey> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > Besides the problem that most drive manufacturers now seem to use > cheese as the data storage surface, I think there are some other > problems: > > 1) I don't trust drive firmware. Time for Open Source/Free Software to enter a new market segment... ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds