From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: Victor Zandy <zandy@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pcroth@cs.wisc.edu, epaulson@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:44:10 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010420153859.13120A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cpx3db3z8bv.fsf@goat.cs.wisc.edu>
On 20 Apr 2001, Victor Zandy wrote:
>
> No dice. Your program does not fix the problem.
>
> If it were a hardware problem, I would expect the problem to occur
> under 2.4.2 as well as 2.2.*, and I would be surprised that we can
> consistently produce the behavior across our 64 node cluster. But we
> are keeping the possibility in mind.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Vic
>
Then, if the FPU is fine, you have just proven that the storage
where the FPU context is saved, gets overwritten. Further, once the
initial write occurs, all subsequent fnsave/frestore operations also
encounter the same spurious write. --OR some continuously-running
floating-point has sneaked into the kernel.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (799.53 BogoMips).
"Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of
course you get it all back when you reboot..."; Actual explanation
obtained from the Micro$oft help desk.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-20 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-19 16:05 BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Victor Zandy
2001-04-19 20:18 ` Michal Jaegermann
2001-04-20 18:50 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 19:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-20 19:20 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 19:44 ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
2001-04-20 19:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-20 19:37 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-20 20:20 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-20 21:44 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-22 1:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-22 2:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 2:30 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-22 18:39 ` David Konerding
2001-04-22 18:59 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 20:59 ` kees
2001-04-23 16:11 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-24 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-24 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-24 16:56 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-24 20:15 ` Michal Jaegermann
2001-04-24 19:49 ` BUG: USB/Reboot Collectively Unconscious
2001-04-24 21:41 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-25 12:37 ` Collectively Unconscious
2001-04-30 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-27 12:18 ` Collectively Unconscious
2001-04-23 18:44 ` BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Erik Paulson
2001-04-24 5:33 alad
2001-04-24 7:56 alad
2001-04-24 8:56 alad
2001-04-24 13:05 Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-24 16:47 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-04-24 18:09 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 18:21 Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 18:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-24 19:17 ` Victor Zandy
2001-04-24 19:51 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.95.1010420153859.13120A-100000@chaos.analogic.com \
--to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=epaulson@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcroth@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=zandy@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).