From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275517AbTHMUho (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:37:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275518AbTHMUhn (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:37:43 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:41991 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275517AbTHMUhn (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:37:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:16:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Adrian Bunk cc: Alan Cox , "David D. Hagood" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: time for some drivers to be removed? In-Reply-To: <20030729193309.GQ28767@fs.tum.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Interesting question - whatever I guess. We don't have an existing convention. > > How many drivers have we got nowdays that failing on just SMP ? > > I 2.6.0-test2 tested on i386 with a .config that is without support for > modules and compiles as much as possible statically into the kernel. > Without claiming completeness, I found this way besides the complete Old > ISDN4Linux subsystem 36 drivers that compile due to cli/sti issues only > on UP. Should those be made to depend on SMP (not SMP) perhaps? They are probably high candidates for fixing if they work UP. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.