From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S279512AbRKASgm>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:36:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S279510AbRKASfN>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:35:13 -0500
Received: from www.transvirtual.com ([206.14.214.140]:26122 "EHLO
	www.transvirtual.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S279509AbRKASfE>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:35:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:34:45 -0800 (PST)
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>
To: Tim Jansen <tim@tjansen.de>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
In-Reply-To: <15zGYm-1gibkeC@fmrl05.sul.t-online.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111011034010.2293-100000@transvirtual.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> I am currently working on something like this, too. It's using Patrick 
> Mochel's driverfs patch 
> (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mochel/device/driverfs.diff-1030) 
> as a base and adds the functionality of the extensions that I did to proc fs 
> for my device registry patch 
> (http://www.tjansen.de/devreg/proc_ov-2.4.7.diff). 

Hm. Sounds like everyone wants the same thing. Some kind of device filesystem. 
Perhaps a projects somewhere should be started.