From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 03:05:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 03:05:14 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:65029 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 03:05:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Jens Axboe cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20020416065427.GK12608@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch is not going anywhere for a while, until all the archs have consistant local_*_*() spinlock but I noted what needs to be fixed and who broke what. I have another method but it was not reasonable or predictable until I finish the driver conversion to fully modular and delete 95% of the duplicated code mess I made over the years. Your are free to copy it into 2.5 as always. regards, --andre On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > > It is 99% usage for distro to ship stable booting kernels given atapi is > > flakey. However if you have a suggestion I am accepting options > > I agree with the option, just not the way it is implemented. If I want > to enable dma after boot, I must be able to do so. > > I have a solution, the current SuSE kernel gets it right. I'll backport > that to 2.4.19-pre once this patch is in. > > -- > Jens Axboe >