From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:59:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:59:54 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:17159 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:59:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:08:28 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Nicolas Pitre , andrea.glorioso@binary-only.com, lkml Subject: Re: Monta Vista software license terms In-Reply-To: <20030205181512.A24002@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org One of the key arguements against the weakness of GPL! Switch the to OSL and then there is legal teeth! Later, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:57:49PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > I find it quite saddening that a lot of people only care about making up shit > > while the company in question is devoting a lot of money in salary to hire > > kernel developers full time whose work has always been merged to community > > trees so far. > > Blah. Why can't mvista put up the source to their products on some ftp > server like suse/redhat/caldera/mandrake/etc?? That's the whole point of > this discussion. mvista doesn't do anything illegal, but they certainly > don't play nice. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group