From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261350AbTIDE0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:26:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264550AbTIDE0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:26:43 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:13840 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261350AbTIDE0m convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:26:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Guillaume Morin cc: James Clark , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Driver Model 2 Proposal - Linux Kernel Performance v Usability In-Reply-To: <20030903182316.GH905@siri.morinfr.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Guillaume Morin wrote: > Dans un message du 03 Sep à 10:49, Andre Hedrick écrivait : > > The only solution is to created a GPL pre-loading module with all the > > GPL_ONLY needed extentions re-exported or externed as to bypass the > > horse sh*t. > > If you do that, you I what ? Create and original work that happens to be open sourced and free and given away for any binary module vendors to use and operate in linux. Allow people the choice/option to go open source or closed source in their product selections. All I see is a WIN -- WIN for the people using Linux. Then again, in the beginning it was about having a choice. Cheers, Andre