From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 04:16:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 04:16:43 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:47633 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 04:16:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 05:16:25 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: "Mike A. Harris" Cc: "Dr S.M. Huen" , Sean Hunter , Xavier Bestel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Why are half the people here trying to hide behind this diskspace > is cheap argument? If we rely on that, then Linux sucks shit. Never mind them, I haven't seen any of them contribute VM code, even ;) OTOH, disk space _is_ cheap, so the other VM - performance related - VM bugs do have a somewhat higher priority at the moment. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)