From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:40:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:40:39 -0400 Received: from ns.snowman.net ([63.80.4.34]:51471 "EHLO ns.snowman.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:40:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:40:11 -0400 (EDT) From: To: "David S. Miller" cc: Kip Macy , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: 3com Driver and the 3XP Processor In-Reply-To: <15145.11935.992736.767777@pizda.ninka.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org So are there any intresting changes one can make to the acenic? I've got one, mostly unused right now. I've been told it is mostly a pair or R5ks hooked back to back. Would anyone have a recommendation for a replacement to the 3cr990? Nick On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > > nick@snowman.net writes: > > Erm, that is going to be a problem. Crypto benifits more from open source > > than any other market segment, and binary only drivers for linux are not > > the way to go. I guess I need to get rid of my 5-10 3cr990s and replace > > them with someone else's product? > > Many of us on the networking developer team believe that making the > programming interface to the cpus on the Tigon3 is the biggest mistake > 3com could ever make. > > What made the Acenic so ubiquitous and interesting was that you could > program the firmware on the board to do whatever you like. They even > provided an entire firmware developer kit so you could hack on it. > > So many useful projects came from this capability. > > I feel dirty working on the Tigon3 driver for 2.4.x because of this. > > Later, > David S. Miller > davem@redhat.com >