linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
To: Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac15
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:57:56 -0300 (BRT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106220655450.933-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106221043360.226-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>



On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > > >  2  4  2  77084   1524  18396  66904   0 1876   108  2220 2464 66079   198   1
> > >                                                                    ^^^^^
> > > > Ok, I suspect that GFP_BUFFER allocations are fucking up here (they can't
> > > > block on IO, so they loop insanely).
> > >
> > > Why doesn't the VM hang the syncing of queued IO on these guys via
> > > wait_event or such instead of trying to just let the allocation fail?
> ...
> > > Does failing the allocation in fact accomplish more than what I'm
> > > (uhoh:) assuming?
> >
> > No.
> 
> hmm..
> 
> Jun 18 07:11:36 kernel: reclaim_page: salvaged ref:1 age:0 buf:0 cnt:1
> Jun 18 07:11:36 last message repeated 27 times
> 
> One thing that _could_ be done about looping allocations is to steal
> a page from the clean list ignoring PageReferenced (if you have any).
> That would be a very expensive 'rob Peter to pay Paul' trade though.

Don't like it.

This goes against the aging logic.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-22 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-15 22:06 Linux 2.4.5-ac15 Alan Cox
2001-06-16 16:48 ` Tom Vier
2001-06-17 18:11 ` Walter Hofmann
2001-06-19  9:19   ` Walter Hofmann
2001-06-20 19:25     ` Adam Sampson
2001-06-19 21:23   ` Walter Hofmann
2001-06-20 19:56     ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-21 15:22       ` Walter Hofmann
2001-06-21  4:35     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-21  6:56       ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-21  5:44         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-21  8:10           ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-21 13:14           ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-21 19:50             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-22  0:32               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-22  9:06           ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-22  9:57             ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2001-06-22 11:50               ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-22 14:08         ` Linux 2.4.5-ac15 / 2.4.6-pre5 Walter Hofmann
2001-06-22 15:50           ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-22 17:27             ` Walter Hofmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0106220655450.933-100000@freak.distro.conectiva \
    --to=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).