From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:00:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:00:08 -0500 Received: from modem-26.leopard.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.144.26]:3332 "EHLO Mail.MemAlpha.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:00:03 -0500 Posted-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:35:17 GMT Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:35:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Riley Williams Reply-To: Riley Williams To: Alexander Viro cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Al, Linus. >> For example, spreading out (and the inherent assumption of "slow >> growth") might make sense for the root directory, and possibly for a >> level below that. It almost certainly does _not_ make sense for a >> directory created four levels down. > Depends on the naming scheme used by admin, for one thing. Linus, I > seriously think that getting the real-life traces to play with would > be a Good Thing(tm) - at least that would allow to test how well > would heuristics of that kind do. Let's be realistic here - you two seem to be talking at cross-purposes, and that will get us precicely nowhere. Linus: If I'm right, your "root directory" refers to the root directory of a particular partition. Correct? Al: If I'm right, your "root directory" refers to the root directory of the entire VFS tree. Correct? If you can try reading each other's comments with both of the above definitions, I think you'll see why you're clearly drifting apart from each other in your comments. Best wishes from Riley.