From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:45:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:45:49 -0400 Received: from w032.z064001165.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net ([64.1.165.32]:42881 "EHLO nakedeye.aparity.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:45:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:47:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matt D. Robinson" To: Richard Gooch cc: "David S. Miller" , "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table In-Reply-To: <200106070620.f576KaI23581@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Gooch wrote: > > Maybe they just want some more of those RedHat stock options ... > > How dare you! This isn't about RedHat stock options. I don't have any > myself, and people like Alan and Dave have shown their integrity and > their commitment to the community and don't deserve to have mud slung > at them. Maybe the problem is that you're trying to push a proprietary > product, and want the kernel to be changed to suit your narrow, > commercial interests, and the "gatekeepers" aren't rolling out the red > carpet for you. Just for the record ... ^options ...^& :) I didn't think it was required. Back to my little world where people can actually get along and work together to make things better and can forget about self-interest, egos, and having to defeat some greater evil, even for a little while. ( ... ) --Matt > Regards, > > Richard....