From: <ognen@gene.pbi.nrc.ca> To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: threading question Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:24:04 -0600 (CST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106121213570.24593-100000@gene.pbi.nrc.ca> (raw) Hello, I am a summer student implementing a multi-threaded version of a very popular bioinformatics tool. So far it compiles and runs without problems (as far as I can tell ;) on Linux 2.2.x, Sun Solaris, SGI IRIX and Compaq OSF/1 running on Alpha. I have ran a lot of timing tests compared to the sequential version of the tool on all of these machines (most of them are dual-CPU, although I am also running tests on 12-CPU Solaris and 108 CPU SGI IRIX). On dual-CPU machines the speedups are as follows: my version is 1.88 faster than the sequential one on IRIX, 1.81 times on Solaris, 1.8 times on OSF/1, 1.43 times on Linux 2.2.x and 1.52 times on Linux 2.4 kernel. Why are the numbers on Linux machines so much lower? It is the same multi-threaded code, I am not using any tricks, the code basically uses PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED and PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM and the thread stack size is set to 8K (but the numbers are the same with larger/smaller stack sizes). Is there anything I am missing? Is this to be expected due to Linux way of handling threads (clone call)? I am just trying to explain the numbers and nothing else comes to mind.... Best regards, Ognen Duzlevski -- ognen@gene.pbi.nrc.ca Plant Biotechnology Institute National Research Council of Canada Bioinformatics team
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-12 18:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2001-06-12 18:24 ognen [this message] 2001-06-12 18:39 ` Davide Libenzi 2001-06-12 18:57 ` from dmesg: kernel BUG at inode.c:486 Olivier Sessink 2001-06-12 18:58 ` threading question Christoph Hellwig 2001-06-12 19:07 ` ognen 2001-06-12 19:15 ` Kip Macy 2001-06-12 19:29 ` Christoph Hellwig 2001-06-12 19:15 ` Christoph Hellwig 2001-06-13 12:20 ` Kurt Garloff 2001-06-13 13:35 ` J . A . Magallon 2001-06-13 14:17 ` Philips 2001-06-13 15:06 ` ognen 2001-06-12 21:44 ` Davide Libenzi 2001-06-12 21:48 ` ognen 2001-06-14 18:15 ` Alan Cox 2001-06-14 22:42 ` threading question (results after thread pooling) ognen 2001-06-14 23:00 ` Mike Castle 2001-06-12 21:58 ` threading question Albert D. Cahalan 2001-06-12 23:48 ` J . A . Magallon 2001-06-12 19:06 ` Kip Macy 2001-06-12 19:14 ` Alexander Viro 2001-06-12 19:25 ` Russell Leighton 2001-06-12 23:27 ` Mike Castle 2001-06-13 17:31 ` bert hubert 2001-06-14 6:45 ` Helge Hafting 2001-06-14 18:28 ` Alan Cox 2001-06-14 19:01 ` bert hubert 2001-06-14 19:22 ` Russell Leighton 2001-06-15 11:29 ` Anil Kumar 2001-06-14 23:05 ` J . A . Magallon 2001-06-16 14:16 ` Michael Rothwell 2001-06-16 15:19 ` Alan Cox 2001-06-16 18:33 ` Russell Leighton 2001-06-16 19:06 ` Michael Rothwell 2001-06-16 21:30 ` Coroutines [was Re: threading question] Russell Leighton 2001-06-12 22:41 ` threading question Pavel Machek 2001-06-13 19:05 Hubertus Franke [not found] <fa.f6da6av.agod3u@ifi.uio.no> [not found] ` <fa.e54jbkv.kg4r99@ifi.uio.no> 2001-06-16 22:22 ` Dan Maas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0106121213570.24593-100000@gene.pbi.nrc.ca \ --to=ognen@gene.pbi.nrc.ca \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: threading question' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).