From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:40:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:40:38 -0400 Received: from mustart.heime.net ([194.234.65.222]:2055 "EHLO mustard.heime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:40:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:40:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: Subject: Tux vs khttpd? (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone! I tried to send this message to the khttpd group, but got no answer. Can any of you help me? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 17:31:20 +0000 From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: khttpd-users@zgp.org Subject: Tux vs khttpd? hi Does anyone know any details about how Tux performs in comparison with khttpd? Is this a separate project, or is it a somehow 'better version' of the khttpd? Are these going to be merged? roy ----- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk