From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S270571AbRHSP4w>; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:56:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S270572AbRHSP4l>; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:56:41 -0400
Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:23567 "HELO Cantor.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S270571AbRHSP4e>;
	Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:56:34 -0400
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:56:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: "Serguei I. Ivantsov" <administrator@svitonline.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 2.4.x & Celeron = very slow system
In-Reply-To: <80346034.20010819185120@svitonline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108191755580.29590-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Serguei I. Ivantsov wrote:

> DJ> Another thing that it might be, is if you're using ACPI instead of
> DJ> APM, the cpu-idle may be causing the CPU to run slower than usual
> DJ> though throttling.
> I'd disabled APM support at all when configuring kernel.

And ACPI too ?

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs