From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S278428AbRJOVXL>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:23:11 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278437AbRJOVXB>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:23:01 -0400
Received: from abstract.com.mx ([209.209.190.216]:61838 "EHLO apexmail.kih.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S278428AbRJOVWt>;
	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:22:49 -0400
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:22:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: grouch <grouch@apex.net>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VIA chipset
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10110151635040.23528-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110151619190.13446-100000@paq.edgers.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Mark Hahn wrote:
>> The stable machine that runs the same brand and model motherboard as the
>> one that is causing troubles is running 2.4.5. It has a WDC
>
>same bios revision?  I think you posted some excerpts of the PCI
>config, and they differed in USB, which is odd.
>

Same bios; I flashed both boards using the info here:
http://www.tyan.com/support/html/b_tr_100at.html
and this bios (why are they always .exe files?):
ftp://ftp.tyan.com/bios/trinity/s1590s_at100/v90w116c.exe