linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@fenrus.demon.nl>
Cc: khttpd mailing list <khttpd-users@zgp.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:56:04 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111031754420.8857-100000@mustard.heime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011103165129.B26040@fenrus.demon.nl>

> TUX has been tested more (by me, Ingo and the other Red Hat folks and on
> several live sites) and is more advanced in that it also has more features
> (virtual hosting etc etc).....

Will this eventually result in tux being merged into the official kernel
and khttpd will cease to exist?

---
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.


       reply	other threads:[~2001-11-03 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20011103165129.B26040@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:56 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
     [not found] <3BE427CD.702@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 18:02 ` [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:08   ` Thomas Lussnig
2001-11-03 19:14     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:21     ` Alan Cox
2001-11-03 19:18       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:31         ` J Sloan
2001-11-04  1:19           ` Alan Cox
2001-11-05 10:15           ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-06  4:46             ` J Sloan
2001-11-03 19:37         ` Alan Cox
2001-11-04  0:07         ` Erik Mouw
2001-11-04 15:32           ` John Alvord
     [not found] <3BE42379.2050604@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 17:08 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
     [not found] <20011103162642.A25824@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:43 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 18:18   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-11-03 20:24   ` Dirk Moerenhout
2001-11-03 16:21 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-04  5:26 ` [khttpd-users] " Chul Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0111031754420.8857-100000@mustard.heime.net \
    --to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --cc=arjan@fenrus.demon.nl \
    --cc=khttpd-users@zgp.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).