From: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63))
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:02:08 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0303120848040.17121-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030311235223.A30856@twiddle.net>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 07:07:26AM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > Only way I see is to detect it at build time, BIG warning to the user
> > of compiler, print a well visible "kernel was built by broken tools"
> > message at boot time to end users ...
>
> You don't have to let things go that far. If you have a test
> case,
gcc team must have, haven't it? Do you know?
> then you can run the test case at build time, and have
> the make actively fail. So the kernel never gets built at all.
I thought about it, I'm just afraid too much kernel wouldn't build.
This bug is in most 2.95, 2.96 and according to Alan in 3.0 and early
3.1) and people would just start "working around" it by commenting out
the check for getting something to work quickly then forgetting about
the issue completely.
Szaka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-02 1:38 ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-04 14:51 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] " Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-05 19:09 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 6:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 6:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 6:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 12:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 14:34 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 14:55 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-06 19:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 19:41 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 20:15 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-06 20:36 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 21:46 ` Oops counter (was Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 7:50 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-07 7:52 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 17:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-07 17:56 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-07 18:08 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-08 13:24 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-08 15:47 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-10 4:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-10 7:22 ` 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-11 17:01 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-11 16:29 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 1:09 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-13 18:02 ` Zach Brown
2003-03-12 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 6:07 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 7:52 ` Richard Henderson
2003-03-12 8:02 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs [this message]
2003-03-12 8:17 ` Richard Henderson
2003-03-12 8:45 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 9:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 23:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-03-12 10:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 15:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:35 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-03-12 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 16:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 16:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 18:25 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 21:54 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-12 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12 22:28 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-14 8:04 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-14 10:00 ` Helge Hafting
2003-03-14 11:02 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 21:07 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-13 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-14 1:08 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-14 4:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-14 6:26 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-15 18:24 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-15 19:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-12 21:13 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-12 22:03 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-13 21:04 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-14 7:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-14 12:16 ` Backward disassembling (was: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-14 16:53 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-03-15 18:34 ` 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand
2003-03-17 6:56 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-17 21:43 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-18 3:28 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-18 7:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-03-20 10:48 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-20 11:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-03-18 19:44 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2003-03-18 6:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-18 6:35 ` John Alvord
2003-03-14 18:01 ` Olaf Titz
2003-03-14 18:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-03-12 23:32 ` [PATCH] OOPS counters Randy.Dunlap
2003-03-06 12:27 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0303120848040.17121-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu \
--to=szaka@sienet.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).