From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:31:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:31:33 -0500 Received: from divine.city.tvnet.hu ([195.38.100.154]:32568 "EHLO divine.city.tvnet.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:31:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:35:10 +0100 (MET) From: Szakacsits Szabolcs To: Arjan van de Ven cc: Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) In-Reply-To: <1047464392.1556.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12 Mar 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 07:07, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > > On 11 Mar 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > If there is a well-known list of compilers, we should put a BIG warning > > > in some core kernel file to guide people to upgrade (or maybe work > > > > Not enough, nobody would notice and today most end user doesn't > > compile the kernel himself, they are just shipped by a broken kernels. > > and all vendors always ship -fno-frame-pointer kernels so far so those > users are ok! Until recently there was no way to build a non > -fno-frame-pointer kernel! If all vendors is Red Hat then I believe you. I know Stephen C. Tweedie audited the kernel. Please don't take things personally, this is the kernel list. Szaka