From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:44:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:44:48 -0400 Received: from hastur.andastra.de ([212.172.44.2]:40972 "HELO mail.andastra.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:44:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:45:20 +0200 (CEST) From: "S.Benoit" To: Kristian Peters cc: "Magnus Naeslund(f)" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: IBM DTLA IDE Made In Hungary In-Reply-To: <3BA5B3A8.5080008@korseby.net> Message-ID: X-Cthulu: HASTUR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Kristian Peters wrote: > I experienced problems with their 40 GB and 75 GB variants. The first one was > made in Thaiwan. So it isn't really a matter from where they're coming from. We have also had a IBM 75GB DTLA go bad here, after running for about 2 months. The replacement sent by IBM was also bad, while a Maxtor worked. This was with FreeBSD and WindowsNT. The guy using the system thinks it's maybe a firmware bug, possibly with SMART. /Benno -- Sebastian Benoit / Software Engineer