From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:29:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:29:22 -0400 Received: from age.cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.22.100]:24847 "EHLO age.cs.columbia.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:29:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:29:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Ion Badulescu To: Tom Sightler cc: , Subject: Re: xircom_cb problems In-Reply-To: <991939245.3b1fcaada710e@eargle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Tom Sightler wrote: > Transferring files between the eepro100 machine running 2.4.2-ac11 and my > laptop produced a result of 2.24MB/s for sending and 2.13MB/s recieving the > file. > > Transfering files between the Alteon Gigabit machine running 2.2.19 and my > laptop resulted in the dismal numbers of 249KB/s sending and 185KB/s recieving, > close to the numbers you quoted above, but actually slightly worse. > > I'm not sure what would explain the 2.2.19 1GB conencted box being 10x slower > than the 2.4.2-ac11 100MB machine. Both of these are slow, actually. I'm getting 7.5-8MB/s when receiving from a 100Mbit box (tulip or starfire, doesn't seem to matter). Transmitting is still slow for me, but that is most likely a different problem -- and I'm looking into it. Moreover, I'm getting 9+MB/s in both directions when using the other driver (xircom_tulip_cb), patched to do half-duplex only. So the card can definitely transfer at network speeds. > I'll apply your patch with the change to MII handling and rerun some simple > file transfers and report the results soon. Looking forward to seeing them... Thanks, Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.