From: Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
To: watermodem <aquamodem@ameritech.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 17:51:58 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106071747460.463-100000@mikeg.weiden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B1F9B5A.42BF726D@ameritech.net>
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, watermodem wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
> >
> > George Bonser writes:
> > > There is, of course, one basic problem with that argument. While you can say
> > > (and probably rightly so) that such a change would not be included in Linus'
> > > kernel, I think anyone is allowed to post a patch that might make it
> > > possible to add protocols as modules. If anyone chooses to use it is each
> > > individual's decision but you could not prevent ACME from creating a patch
> > > that allows protocol modules as long as they distributed the patch. Also, I
> > > know that you are allowed to distribute proprietary modules in binary form
> > > but are there any restrictions on what function these modules can perform?
> > > I don't remember seeing any such restrictions.
> >
> > People can post whatever patches which do whatever, sure.
> > But this isn't what matters.
> >
> > What matters is the API under which a binary-only module may interface
> > to the kernel. Linus specifies that only the module exports in his
> > tree fall into this API.
> >
> > As I stated in another email, the allowance of binary-only kernel
> > modules is a special exception to the licensing of the kernel made by
> > Linus. The GPL by itself, does not allow this at all.
> >
> > Later,
> > David S. Miller
> > davem@redhat.com
>
> David,
>
> What is your real problem with La Monte's Code.
> I don't buy your more "blessed than thou" argument.
> It is a typical response one normally sees in large
> organizations from folk with "empires" to protect.
> Coming from the "land of warring tribes" firm it is
> a attitude I have seen often. My response is take
> a vacation, chill out and reassess.
What words would you like to put in his mouth to replace those he used?
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-07 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3B1E5CC1.553B4EF1@alacritech.com>
2001-06-05 16:59 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2001-06-06 22:07 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2001-06-07 19:11 ` Matthias Urlichs
2001-06-11 18:26 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-06 " La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2001-06-13 16:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-06 22:15 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 " David S. Miller
2001-06-06 22:36 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-06 22:42 ` Richard Gooch
2001-06-06 22:52 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-06 23:21 ` Matt D. Robinson
2001-06-06 23:51 ` Richard Gooch
2001-06-07 0:51 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-07 5:37 ` George Bonser
2001-06-07 5:50 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-07 6:00 ` George Bonser
2001-06-07 15:18 ` watermodem
2001-06-07 15:51 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2001-06-09 22:09 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregistertable watermodem
2001-06-09 23:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-10 2:59 ` Horst von Brand
2001-06-10 4:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-06-07 1:22 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table Ben Greear
2001-06-07 5:16 ` Matt D. Robinson
2001-06-07 18:03 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister Alan Cox
2001-06-07 5:46 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table David S. Miller
2001-06-07 6:20 ` Richard Gooch
2001-06-07 6:47 ` Matt D. Robinson
2001-06-07 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-08 1:31 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-06 23:31 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-06 23:43 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-07 10:03 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-07 10:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-07 17:52 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-08 8:29 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-08 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-08 22:54 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-08 23:46 ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-11 8:45 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-11 9:43 ` Helge Hafting
2001-06-11 16:17 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-11 18:31 ` Jacob Luna Lundberg
2001-06-11 18:48 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister Alan Cox
2001-06-11 20:34 ` Jacob Luna Lundberg
2001-06-12 7:08 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregistertable Helge Hafting
2001-06-07 10:05 ` [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table Russell King
2001-06-07 15:27 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-07 17:01 ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-07 11:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-07 11:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-07 0:14 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0106071747460.463-100000@mikeg.weiden.de \
--to=mikeg@wen-online.de \
--cc=aquamodem@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).