linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: George Bonser <george@gator.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.4.6-pre2 page_launder() improvements
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 05:43:37 -0300 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106100541200.1742-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CHEKKPICCNOGICGMDODJMEJLDEAA.george@gator.com>

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, George Bonser wrote:

> I took it out of the load balancer and regained control in
> seconds. The 15 minute load average showed somewhere over 150
> with a bazillion apache processes. Even top -q would not update
> when I put it back into the balancer. The load average and
> number of processes started to increase until I got to some
> point where it would just stop providing output. Again, control
> returned within seconds after taking it out of the balancer. As
> far as I could tell, I never at any time got more than 100MB
> into swap.

OK, I guess it's just thrashing.  Having 64MB of RAM with
250 Apache processes will give you about 256kB per Apache
process ... minus page table, TCP, etc... overhead.

That sounds like the machine just gets a working set
larger than the amount of available memory. It should
work better with eg. 96, 128 or more MBs of memory.

regards,

Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-10  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-10  4:40 Rik van Riel
2001-06-10  8:38 ` George Bonser
2001-06-10  8:43   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2001-06-10  8:52     ` George Bonser
2001-06-10  9:06     ` George Bonser
2001-06-10  9:08     ` George Bonser
2001-06-10 19:30     ` George Bonser
2001-06-11  3:03 ` Daniel Stone
2001-06-11 16:18   ` George Bonser
2001-06-13  4:42 ` Alok K. Dhir
2001-06-13 13:49   ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-13 18:46   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0106100541200.1742-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
    --to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=george@gator.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --subject='RE: [PATCH] 2.4.6-pre2 page_launder() improvements' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).