Re: obsolete code must die

From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Daniel Dickman <ddickman@nyc.rr.com>
Cc: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.ne.mediaone.net>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: obsolete code must die
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:09:40 -0300 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106132207340.11235-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004701c0f46e$11a8a9e0$480e6c42@almlba4sy7xn6x>

On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Daniel Dickman wrote:

> Thanks for your email. I am aware of the "traditions" of the
> Linux kernel, and this is really why I wanted to start a
> discussion going about this.

OK, so you almost certainly ARE a troll:

1) proposing to remove support for hardware many of us use
   every day
2) on purpose going against tradition
3) replying private email back to the list
4) and all this using  Microsoft Outlook ;)

The hints pointing towards "troll, Troll, TROLL" are
overwhelming.

Lets stop the thread here.

thanks,

Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/